Socio-Economic and Racial Disparities Reflected in SAT Scores
It it no surprise whatsoever that black and brown students score lower on standardized tests than their white and yellow peers. This fact is one more indicator of the “achievement gap” between minority students and white students in the United States. (For more on this, see the article from Inside Higher Ed).
Some analysts are more careful to draw socioeconomic distinctions, rather than racial ones. The fact is that poorer students generally have fewer educational opportunities, inadequate schools, and are held to lower standards than kids in wealthier areas–where parents raise tens of thousands of dollars each year in silent auctions and other fundraisers–all to ensure that their kids continue to get the best of the best.
The College Board has announced that more young people–including ones from lower socioeconomic backgrounds–are taking the SAT test than ever before. Even so, the average score for each component of the test has remained about the same: critical reading (502), mathematics (515) and writing (494).
This steady average masks some uncomfortable realities. First, even though more poor students are taking the tests (which might bring scores lower, on average), more rich students are also taking the tests–sometimes 2 or 3 times. So just because the average is steady does not mean that scores among students at the lower rungs of the socioeconomic ladder or performing better.
Further, African American, Native American, and Latino students consistently score well below Anglo and Asian American students. Here are the averages for those groups:
African Americans: Critical reading: 430; Math: 426; Writing: 424
Hispanics: Critical reading: 455; Math: 460; Writing: 447
Native Americans: Critical reading: 485; Math: 491; Writing: 470
Note that scores for each of these groups went DOWN this past year over the previous year, while average scores for Anglos and Asian student went UP.
No wonder more and more colleges are making standardized tests optional in the admissions process, or are finding some other ways to evaluate the potential of minority students. There is no getting around the fact that students from poorer communities score worse on these tests than wealthy students. So how can colleges correct for these tests–legally–and recruit and retain more qualified minorities onto their campuses?
TAKE THE POLL!
Mark Montgomery
College Admission Counselor
Technorati Tags: SAT, ACT, standardized tests, minorities, achievement gap, socio-economic Del.icio.us Tags: SAT, ACT, standardized tests, minorities, achievement gap, socio-economic
2 Responses to “Socio-Economic and Racial Disparities Reflected in SAT Scores”
Leave a Reply
- Weighted or Unweighted GPA?
- Six Tips For Getting Great Letters of Recommendation For College
- How Good are Advanced Placement (AP) Courses? Are They Worth Taking?
- Class Size and Student-to-Faculty Ratios: What the Statistics Don't Tell You
- Division I vs. Division III: Sports as a Job, or Scholar-Athlete?
- Quality of the Educational Experience: Questions to Ask Admissions Officers
- College Fit: How Does the Shirt Look on Me?
- Calculating Your "Real" Grade Point Average (GPA)
- SAT Will Allow Students To Submit Best Scores To Colleges
- School's Out! Top 10 Summertime Tips for College Admission
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007


August 27th, 2008 at 2:05 pm
[...] Montgomery over at Great College Advice has a nice review of some of the new issues that are being raised with the SAT exam. Basically, [...]
September 24th, 2008 at 12:31 pm
[...] of my personal pet peeves is the fact that these tests may serve to keep quality minority students from applying to [...]