Low College Graduation Rates? Blame Low Admissions Standards

‘Tis the season.  High school graduation.

It’s a wonderful time of the year.  But it’s also a time of year when high school seniors–and maybe a few juniors–are waking up to the fact that perhaps they aren’t ready for college.

Part of the problem, it seems, is that high school graduation requirements have been diluted. Let’s be frank: the graduation bar is pretty low.

But that does not mean, however, that the bar for entering college should be low.  Of course, we all want to give people second chances and to provide as much access to higher education as possible.  But something is seriously wrong.  And some states are waking up to the fact that access has its costs.  Financial.  And Educational.

At many of our colleges and  universities have four and six-year graduation rates at public universities is are really, really low. Really low.

Here are some examples (with statistics from the Education Trust and Wintergreen Orchard House):

University of Rio Grande in Rio Grande, Ohio.  90% of the students there are white.  And in 2007, the six year graduation rate was 12.7%. In the fall of 2006, approximately 550 freshmen matriculated.  Thus we can expect that about 70 of those will graduate by spring of 2012.  Tuition, room, and board?  a bit over $25,000.  Would you take out a loan if you knew your chance of graduating was about one in eight?

Concordia College is an HBCU affiliated with the Lutheran Church and is located in Selma, Alabama. Ninety-six percent of students are African-American.  The cost for room and board is about $12,000 per year, which seems pretty reasonable.  But only 9.1% of students graduate from Concordia in 6 years. What is going on?  Would you lay down your hard-earned money for a 1-in-10 shot at a Bachelor’s degree?

Western New Mexico University in Silver City, NM, serves a student population that is 46% Latino and 38% white.  This is a publicly funded university, and just over 2,000 students attending classes on its main campus, with a few hundred more scattered on smaller, further-flung satellites (New Mexico is a big, sparsely populated state).  The graduation rate?  15.3 percent finish in 6 years.  Costs?  Those subsidized by the good taxpayers of the state of New Mexico pay $4700 per year.  And the foolish 13% of Western New Mexico University who come from out of state pay nearly $22,000 in tuition–before room, board, books, fees, travel, and entertainment is included.  Highway robbery.

According to an article today in the New Orleans Times-Picayune, some people are starting to figure out that perhaps if we raised the admission requirements to college, perhaps the graduation rate would go up.

Blinding Flash of the Obvious.

The fact is that admissions standards at many colleges are abysmally low.  The joke in the business is that some colleges will admit any kid with a pulse and a checkbook.  And in today’s tough financial climate, some of these bottom feeder colleges–especially the private ones–should be nervous.  There are still plenty of pulses, but fewer checkbooks.  And perhaps consumers will be more wary about how they spend their money.  I mean, come on:  a 10% graduation rate?  Would you hire a consultant with a 10% success rate?  How about a plumber who fixed 13% of all leaks?  Or how about depositing your savings at a bank at which 11% of customers earned interest?  Looney, you say?  Ab-so-bloomin‘-lutely.   Some private colleges deserve to die.

It’s easy to see that private colleges may crash and burn as easy credit dries up and consumers wise up to the fact they should perhaps shop around a bit before they plop down their cash on the barrel.

But what about publicly-funded colleges?  Western New Mexico has a full-time faculty of 114 highly educated professors, plus another 150 part-time instructors.  Taxpayers foot mostof their salaries.  I’m wondering why the New Mexico state legislature isn’t all over that place, holding hearings, and asking whether the pointy-headed academics are actually doing their jobs?  What are the teaching, anyway?  Why isn’t there at least one legislator threatening to close the place down as taxpayer rip-off?

But the real issue is not the teachers:  there is only so much teachers can do when the individuals sitting in their classrooms is academically underprepared, or perhaps even marginally literate.

I’m all about access.  But when does our emphasis on access obscure our failure to educate?  When does our desire to offer everyone a second chance collide with the fact that college is–and should be–academically rigorous, and not all kids are cut out for academic work? When does our believe in equality of opportunity for all mask the fact that kids are still graduating from high school without even the most basic of academic skills?

When should an admissions officer look at an applicant’s transcript, size up the student, and say, “I’m sorry, I could admit you, but I just don’t think you will graduate”?

Sure, this would be mean.  Such brutal honesty might tromp on some poor young person’s self-esteem.  The kid might become sad.  She might cry. She might be disappointed.

But isn’t it downright immoral–criminal, even–to take that family’s money, to raise false hopes, to put the student in classes in which we can predict she will fail, and then watch her descend into a spiral of debt and despair?

Here’s what the admissions officer should say:   “I’m sorry.  You have not met the required standard.  Go to the community college at a fraction of the cost of this four year institution, do the remedial work necessary to succeed, prove you can handle college work, and come back and see me in a year. I refuse to take your money , because in my professional judgment I cannot, if I were to matriculate, you would be unlikely to graduate.  I’m sorry.”

In other words, folks, raise the bar for admissions. According to the Times Picayune, tougher admissions standards are working at Louisiana State.  More kids are graduating.

Duh.

So the lessons of this lengthy epistle?

1.  Private colleges with minimalist admissions standards may very well be crushed by the current economic crisis.  The College of Santa Fe is already in its final death throes.  Expect others to follow suit.

2.  Taxpayers and legislators–as well as ordinary families seeking educational options for their kids–should be alarmed at low graduation rates, and should militate to rase admission standards–if only to stop wasting government dollars.

 

Thanks for reading to the end.  This was a doozy.

 

Mark Montgomery
Educational Consultant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Technorati Tags: graduation rate, admission standards, college, university, Concordia, Lutheran, Selma, Western New Mexico University, Rio Grande, Louisiana State, LSU, Colorado Del.icio.us Tags: graduation rate, admission standards, college, university, Concordia, Lutheran, Selma, Western New Mexico University, Rio Grande, Louisiana State, LSU, Colorado

Traditional Four-Year College Degrees are the Exception, not the Rule

You must read this article by Neil Swidley in  the Boston Globe.  Mr. Swidley  pulls together some great information that shatters the myth of the four year college degree.

Fact:  Census data from 2005 indicate that only 28% of Americans have obtained a Bachelors degree.

Fact:  Only about 10% of Americans take the “traditional path” of completing their Bachelors degree in 4 years.

Fact:  At private four-year colleges, the percentage of students graduating in four years is, on average, 54%.  Among our public institutions, the four-year graduation rate is 32%.

The selective, elite colleges have better four-year graduations rates.  But if you compare the total number of students in the Ivy League (about 60,000) to the number of undergraduates at just one of our largest institutions (40,000 at Ohio State University, for example), or with the 6.6 million students enrolled in our community colleges across the country, you can start to see the disparity between those few how pursue the “traditional” four-year path and the majority who take five, six, or more years to complete their Bachelor’s degree.

Mr. Swidley’s main point is that the general public does not understand that “swirling” (the term enrollment managers use to describe the the dynamic of students of moving in and out and around the higher education system) is the norm in higher education, and that policy makers in higher education tend to create systems (e.g., rules pertaining to the transfer of credits from one university to another) that enshrine the myth and deny the reality:  swirlers are the vast majority of the people in our higher education system.

Parents and students should read this article.  Before you embark on a higher education plan, you need to consider that it is more likely that you complete in five or six years or more, then you need to factor that likelihood into your plans.

Think about the following:

1.  Will you attend a public university?  If so, study the four and six-year graduation rates at your school, and give yourself permission to consider taking longer to complete your degree. Don’t beat yourself up if you find it hard to finish in four years–you’re in good company!

2.  Do you know what you will major in?  If not–and if you will attend a large, state university–keep in mind that you are perhaps most at risk of having to take a 5th or 6th year to complete your degree, as it is often difficult to satisfy credit requirements if you do not plan far enough ahead.  Better still, try to narrow your choices early:  the impact of changing your major from political science to economics will be less than if you switch from engineering to art history.

3.  If you think you may take 5 or 6 years to complete, how will you pay for the degree?  Tuition will likely increase each year, and usually credits are cheaper if you enroll full-time than if you enroll part-time.  So it may make more sense to take a full year off, get a decent job, save money, and then return to school full-time.

4.  If you do take some time off between matriculation and graduation, what will you do?  What sort of job will you get?  Pursue an internship or co-op program or apprenticeship?  Perhaps you might join Americorps or spend some time abroad learning a new language.  Don’t just flounder around–make the time off part of your overall educational plan.

5.  If you anticipate that money will be the primary obstacle to completing your degree, consider enrolling in a two-year community college and take courses that your state goverment guarantees can be transferred to your flagship state university.

Both policy makers and the general public need to abandon the myth of the four-year college degree.  It is not the norm–it is the exception.

Students–and their parents–need to build their educational expectations and plans around the norm.  Instead of feeling like failures or otherwise inadequate learners, perhaps we need a new slogan to rally the “silent majority” of students in higher education.

“Swirlers Are Swell”.

“Two, Four, Six, Eight — It Takes a While to Graduate”

“College:  I Did It MY WAY!”

Any other catchy slogans you can think of?  Add them in the comments below–we’ll print up T-Shirts!


Mark Montgomery
Educational Consultant


Technorati Tags: college, university, graduation rate, degree, four year, two year, community college, Boston Globe, Ivy League, Ohio State Del.icio.us Tags: college, university, graduation rate, degree, four year, two year, community college, Boston Globe, Ivy League, Ohio State